2012/6/7 Pete Batard <[email protected]>: > On 2012.06.06 20:19, Lars Kanis wrote: > If it's tied to msvcrt.dll, then we'll play it conservative and only apply > -fno-omit-frame-pointer to MinGW. > > Proposed patch attached. I'm not seeing any ill effects from enforcing the > option, which is to be expected. If nobody comments on it, I'll push it to > the repository later on today.
Your patch is working fine for me. Thanks! Another petition: Could you do me a big favour and bring the development of libusb and libusbx together again or drop development on either of them or mark one of each as research branch or whatever? >From a user perspective it is sad to have no released version for almost two years, but it is even annoying to have to do all tests with two different versions and to have to communicate with two parties in case of issues or questions. This is especially problematic because both projects share 95% of the same code and exhibit the same features, platforms and license. I guess you already did a lot of discussion about it - maybe you could reconsider it? -- Regards, Lars Kanis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
