On 2012.06.15 22:25, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > Did you really put that HID junk back in there? This is a bad idea. HID > users SHOULD NOT be using libusb and I will not add this IOHID support > to the Darwin backend.
That's fine, we're not going to force you to do something you're not comfortable with. For what is worth, HID support has always been readily available on Linux, and is not much of an issue on Windows either. From our last discussions on the subject, it seemed that quite a few users seemed to be of the idea that convenience trumped other concerns, especially given that using HID requires no manual installation on Windows, unlike WinUSB, which is why we think it makes a lot of sense to add it back. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
