On 2012.08.23 21:06, David Grant wrote:
> So why the need, as
> you say, to embed the original driver for the restore part?

If you read what I wrote, you'll see that what I pointed out is if you 
wanted to do it with the *current* version of libwdi, i.e. one that 
doesn't implement a restore feature. I wasn't talking about limitations 
for implementing the restore feature itself.

Basically, if you want to do a restore with the *current* version of 
libwdi, and you know the old driver, you can. But you need to have the 
driver you plan to "restore" embedded in the library. This isn't a 
proper solution though, just a workaround for a missing feature.

> And I hear that you are saying that if the driver was non-WHQL it would
> lead to a prompt?

Logically, that's what I would expect, since if the user had to go 
through a prompt during driver installation, they're likely to have to 
go through the same prompt when the same driver is restored (re-installed).

Regards,

/Pete


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to