On 2012.09.17 06:12, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > For the NEWS file, I have two comments about the following > statement. > > * Add libusb0 (libusb-win32) and libusbK driver support on Windows. > Note that isochronous transfers are not supported yet for these > drivers, and that using the libusb-win32 filter driver against a > composite member devices is also not supported > > "a composite member devices" should probably be changed to > "composite devices".
Yeah, I'm not too sure of the best way to convey that we're talking about the device that Windows instantiates for one interface, rather than the actual composite device (or composite parent in Windows terminology). > And to avoid confusion, I think it is better to "Note that isochronous > transfers are not supported in libusbx yet for these drivers" since > libusb0.sys and libusbk.sys do support isochronous transfer. I see what you mean. Yeah, I want to avoid confusing users into believing that it's the driver rather than libusbx that doesn't support isoc yet. Will fix that for release. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
