On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Alas I had tunnel vision on the master branch, noone helped me out of > that, and 1.0.9 took too long.
Glad that you recognized that. > I think it turned out very good once > it was done, but anyway, everyone is busy working on new and even > better versions now. :) > It is probably good enough for Mac OS X and Linux. But on Windows, libusb-1.0.9 is basically not usable due to missing important fixes. And even under Linux, it has missed quite some good patches from Hans and others if compared to the latest libusbx. Maybe you should look into libusb-1.0.10 release to show that libusb is still relevant... -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
