On Sep 26, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Lionel Debroux <lionel_debr...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> > I think it turned out very good once
> > it was done, but anyway, everyone is busy working on new and even
> > better versions now. :)
>
> It is probably good enough for Mac OS X and Linux. But on Windows,
> libusb-1.0.9 is basically not usable due to missing important fixes.
> And even under Linux, it has missed quite some good patches
> from Hans and others if compared to the latest libusbx.
>
> Maybe you should look into libusb-1.0.10 release to show that
> libusb is still relevant...
... or maybe he should find more productive ways to spend his time than
trying to pretend playing catch-up with a more active and more
featureful fork, which was already adopted by the main Linux distros.
If you can't add anything constructive to the discussion please keep your comments to yourself. libusbx is in no way any less featureful on Linux and OSX than libusb.
Besides, I personally will not support libusbx (only libusb) so libusbx will eventually end up falling behind on OSX support. And, no, libusbx adding HID support (planned by libusbx) to the OSX backend is not a feature its another bad idea.
-Nathan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
