On 2012.10.12 19:55, Sean McBride wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:46:45 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau said: >> Including a Xcode project may be a solution. I will try to have a look. > > I suggested it for completeness, but personally I don't think it's a good > idea.
I'd also vote for XCode rather than CMake, unless CMake support comes as standard from XCode. Overall I'm against the idea of asking developers to first install some tool, when they already have a perfectly good tool that should do the job. >> Note that autotools are requited _only_ for people using the GIT version. >> "Normal" users will use a released tar.bz2 version of libusbx with no >> need for autotools. > > What is the difference? What is included with the "released" version that is > not included with git, and why? configure is already generated in the official source tarballs, so you basically just need make, which is expected to be installed as standard. Especially you don't need to have autoconf and automake installed. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
