On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:01:28 +0800, Xiaofan Chen said: >> I didn't think Apple used gcc anymore. How about testing to see if this >> is a valid option before trying to use it instead of just removing it? > >Apple calls its compiler gcc. But yes it is llvm based.
Apple used to use gcc, or rather their own fork of it, up to version 4.2. Then they started transitioning to llvm/clang, and these days don't ship gcc. 'gcc' exists as a symlink for compatibility. >gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00) Between the transition, there was also 'llvm gcc' which is a hybrid with the gcc front end and llvm backend, that's the above. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
