2013/5/29 Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie>: > On 2013.05.28 11:25, Hans de Goede wrote: >> +int LIBUSB_CALL libusb_set_strerror_locale(const char *locale); >> +const char * LIBUSB_CALL libusb_strerror(enum libusb_error errcode); > > Why not go: > const char * LIBUSB_CALL libusb_strerror(enum libusb_error errcode, > const char *locale); > ?
Because very few people will need to change the locale parameter for different calls to libusb_strerror()? Because it is adding complexity to the API comprehension? Because the API will not look like the ISO C99 strerror(3) function any more? Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
