Hi, On 06/08/2013 07:55 PM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2013.06.08 16:45, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: >> Should we change the history and reapply the patches using the correct >> procedure? >> >> I volunteer to do the job. > > I'm not too bothered about it at this stage, if we have a commit not too > far along that will sort the nano. > > If people come to us before that, and provide a libusbx version of > 1.0.15.10728, we'll probably remember that this may mean 4 different > commits (or more realistically 2, as I doubt we'll meet anyone who did a > git pull right during the last merges). > > I also think we will inconvenience more people by changing our public > history and forcing them to sort their local git repo than anything > else. Mistakes happen. As long as they get fixed, it's not really an issue.
+1, doing a forced push to a public repo is a big nono, one should never ever do that. And if you will it will likely make security alarm bells ring in various places, and rightly so... Regards, Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services 3. A single system of record for all IT processes http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
