On 2013.06.13 21:39, Hans de Goede wrote:
> -                                     "failed to re-claim interface %d after 
> reset", i);
> +                                     "failed to re-claim interface %d after 
> reset: %s",
> +                                     i, libusb_error_name(r));

Not sure if libusb_error_name is that helpful when it only prints the 
error code internal designation. Maybe sterror() would be better suited 
(even with the disadvantage of being potentially localized when someone 
sends us a log).

Right now, I don't really have a strong preference one way or the other, 
so I'll leave it up to you.

Another ack.

Regards,

/Pete

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to