Manuel Francisco Naranjo wrote: > > > Be mindful that > > > > |int a; > > a = 1; > > int b; > > b = a+1; > > | > > > > Will not work on MS compilers. All the variable declarations must be > > at the top. > > Thus windows_usb.c lines 584 & 2366 also break MSVC compilation. > > Really? Is that stupid?
No, it's smart, it's just smart C89. Microsoft has not implemented C99, and has not given a timeline for doing so. Virtually all important Windows code is done in C# or C++. On a related note, I've never understood why the Linux world clings so tightly to C. Many of the improvements in C99 were introduced because of C++. In the C++ world, the delta between MSVC and gcc is very, very small. You don't have to dive hip-deep into templates and metaprogramming and inheritance; it's quite viable to use C++ as a better C. In my experience, most programming solutions are more clearly expressed in C++ than in C. -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
