Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:24:51AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:17PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >>>> There is unfortunately a pretty prevalent >>>> segfault in the latest libvirt. If a qemu >>>> domain is defined without an emulator >>>> specified, libvirtd crashes. >>>> >>>> This is doubly unfortunate since current >>>> virtinst generates an emulator-less config >>>> for all qemu and kvm guests (I'm about to fix >>>> this upstream though). >>> #%(*&#@([EMAIL PROTECTED] Damn. This is worthy of a brown paper bag release >>> for libvirt >>> to fix this shockingly bad bug. >>> >> If we are going to do this I'd really like to get the >> 2 pending max vcpu patches committed, since it's a >> big issue that we largely disallow smp kvm guests >> at this moment. > > Do you need more reviews ? I didn't realized we had pending unapplied > patches ... Repost if necessary, thanks ! > > Daniel >
My maxvcpu patch is dependent on Guido's patch which hasn't been committed yet but has received enough ACKs Thanks, Cole -- Libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
