Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 07:49 +0200 schrieb Daniel Veillard: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:55:26PM +0100, Henri Cook wrote: > > A good news - sorry I wasn't aware of the current stance on arbitrary > > parameters and can say I completely agree with it. > > > > Scheduler Parameters API sounds interesting - i'll see if I can find > > time to look into it - if there's anyone who already knows how it works > > that sees this as a quick patch though, massive points > > http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainSetSchedulerParameters
A couple of months ago I tried to implement this for kvm. I failed on rpc though. It should be as "easy" as setting setpriority(2). > > http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virSchedParameter > > http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainGetSchedulerParameters > > it's not fantastic, it's a free form API, you need to be consistent in > the name and type of parameters returned by Get and allow a subset to be > modified by Set. > > Daniel > -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
