On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:56:52 -0400, John Ferlan wrote: ...
> I don't mind kernel or hypervisor, although it seems kernel is more > technically correct. How about "hypervisor and OS" like is described for > the "shareable" attribute which is related? > > So, how about the following: > > If supported by the hypervisor and OS, the optional <code>sgio</code> > attribute indicates whether unprivileged SG_IO commands are filtered for > the disk. Valid settings are "filtered" or "unfiltered", where the > default is "filtered". > > Additionally, given the rest of the conversation, should the <disk> > discussion of 'sgio' also be updated similarly? Currently it states: > > <dd> > Indicates whether the kernel will filter unprivileged > SG_IO commands for the disk, valid settings are "filtered" or > "unfiltered". Defaults to "filtered". Similar to <code>rawio</code>, > <code>sgio</code> is only valid for device 'lun'. > </dd> > > e.g > > If supported by the hypervisor and OS, indicates whether unprivileged > SG_IO commands are filtered for the disk. Valid settings are "filtered" > or "unfiltered" where the default is "filtered". Only available when the > <code>device</code> is 'lun'. Both wordings sound okay to me. ACK > > John
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
