On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 16:07:42 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 15:15 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > > -virBitmapPtr nodeGetPresentCPUBitmap(const char *sysfs_prefix); > > > -virBitmapPtr nodeGetCPUBitmap(const char *sysfs_prefix, int > > > *max_id); > > > +virBitmapPtr nodeGetPresentCPUBitmap(const char *sysfs_prefix, > > > + int *size); > > > +virBitmapPtr nodeGetCPUBitmap(const char *sysfs_prefix, > > > + int *size); > > > > I'd prefer something like "ncpus" or maxcpu rather than size. For > > getting size virBitmapSize() is totally apropriate. > > I've used "size" on purpose, because I didn't want people to > mistake that for a count of online or present CPUs: it's the > size of the returned bitmap, same value you'd get if you > called virBitmapSize() on it.
I thin the 'max_id' or perhaps 'max_cpu_id' were better. Otherwise I'd stay with calling virBitmapSize. It doesn't then look like it's adding any value on top of calling virBitmapSize directly and could actually be optimized out. Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
