On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:50 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > libvirt does not require that all functionality is present on > all platforms. So as long as an error is raised if the user > requests an unsupported configuration, we're fine. As for the > XML question, libvirt requires 100% backwards compatability so > its XML format is essentially "append" only, existing features > cannot be dropped/changed.
This is also the intent for netcf's XML (warning: neither the XML format nor the API can be considered stable yet, but I hope that we get to that point very soon) As for backend differences, we definitely need to address them on a case-by-case basis, weighing the headache of dealing with different backends with different feature sets against the importance of that feature. David -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
