On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:58:30PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > Hi, all. > > I looked over thread for this particular patch again and found resolution is > we: > > 1. make a more sane cleanup order in libvirtd's main function (already done > by [1]). > 2. rewrite linked series [2] by introducing event loop closing callback (ok) > > But there is no resolution on this patch itself if I am not mistaken and > it is not pushed too.
It's been a while and the thread became fairly large to track, correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't the issue this patch is trying to solve disappear once we go with a reworked version of [2]? Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
