On 14.12.2017 15:09, Erik Skultety wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:58:30PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: >> Hi, all. >> >> I looked over thread for this particular patch again and found resolution is >> we: >> >> 1. make a more sane cleanup order in libvirtd's main function (already done >> by [1]). >> 2. rewrite linked series [2] by introducing event loop closing callback (ok) >> >> But there is no resolution on this patch itself if I am not mistaken and >> it is not pushed too. > > It's been a while and the thread became fairly large to track, correct me if > I'm wrong but wouldn't the issue this patch is trying to solve disappear once > we go with a reworked version of [2]? >
This way we can ask RPC threads serving requests of some driver to finish but we can not be sure they are actually finish if we do not join them before calling virStateCleanup. Nikolay -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
