Since this rpm released already, should fix be made anyway? Should it just treat that comma as a dot (current fix is a little bit more sophisticated)?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>wrote: > On 25.09.2012 15:01, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: > > Hi, Michal, > > > > This is qemu 1.0.1 rpm from fc17. > > > > Yup, it's a bug. A typo to be exact. > > Here is the build: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=344872 > > and if you'd download and unpack .src.rpm and subsequently > qemu-kvm-1.0.1.tar.gz you'll find VERSION file. Since everything (spec > file, archive name, etc.) but VERSION file says 1.0.1 I assume it's a > typo and hence the bug. I must admit very tricky one, though. > > [CC'ing Cole who made the build so maybe he can spin another one] > > Michal > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 25.09.2012 10:58, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: > >>> This patch fixes incorrect help screen parsing for QEMU 1.0.1 package > >>> Version line changed from > >>> QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 > Fabrice Bellard > >>> To > >>> QEMU emulator version 1.0,1 (qemu-kvm-1.0.1), Copyright (c) > 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard > >> > >> This seems like a bug to me. If it is a micro version number, why is it > >> delimited with comma instead of dot? If it is not a micro version > >> number, can we threat it like it is? > >> > >> BTW: what distro is this so I can chase this down to see if it's a bug > >> or not? > >> > >> Michal > > > > -- > > libvir-list mailing list > > libvir-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > > > > -- Dmitry Fleytman Technology Expert and Consultant, Daynix Computing Ltd. Cell: +972-54-2819481 Skype: dmitry.fleytman
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list