On 09/25/2012 11:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> I agree, it smells very much like a QEMU/distro bug to me. >> >> It is an upstream bug: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-02/msg02527.html >> >> Distros should probably be backporting that particular patch, but >> there's still the question of whether we should deal with it in libvirt >> because it is upstream. > > Well it is a bug on only one branch of upstream, that was promptly > fixed, so I still don't think we should complicate libvirt by dealing > with it. It is trivial for QEMU maintainers to fix
Meanwhile, I'm not opposed to these patches. It may be a trivial fix for distro packagers, but not so obvious for people building qemu from scratch. However, I have to wonder if src/util/util.c:virParseVersionString needs to be taught to handle comma, and also whether qemuCapsParseHelpStr should reuse virParseVersionString rather than open-coding its own parser. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
