On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 14:37:40 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> FWIW, I keep the patchset that I push into Gentoo now in a bit >> friendlier place to access: >> >> http://git.cardoe.com/?p=libvirt.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/v1.0.2-maint >> >> Due to Gentoo "supporting" each release of libvirt, we'll have a >> stable branch for every release that others are welcome to follow or >> look at or make suggestions to include. > > Doug, any reason for not having them in upstream libvirt git? We already > have maint branches for some releases, which happen to be the releases > present in Fedora and the main reason for that is the people maintaining > them are mostly interested in Fedora. But we encourage others that are > interested in having maint branches for other releases to do so. And the > nice thing about it is, that if an ugly bug that has been present in > libvirt for a long time may be fixed in all maint branches at once even > by people who are really interested in just some of them. > > Jirka
No reason not to. I'll gladly add them if people would like that. -- Doug Goldstein -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
