On 04/02/14 05:05, Eric Blake wrote: > Now that each virStorageSource can track allocation information, > and given that we already have the information without extra > syscalls, it's easier to just always populate the information > directly into the struct than it is to sometimes pass the address > of the struct members down the call chain. > > * src/storage/storage_backend.h (virStorageBackendUpdateVolInfo) > (virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfo) > (virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfoFD): Update signature. > * src/storage/storage_backend.c (virStorageBackendUpdateVolInfo) > (virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfo) > (virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfoFD): Always populate struct > members instead. > * src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c > (virStorageBackendDiskMakeDataVol): Update client. > * src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c (virStorageBackendProbeTarget) > (virStorageBackendFileSystemRefresh) > (virStorageBackendFileSystemVolRefresh): Likewise. > * src/storage/storage_backend_gluster.c > (virStorageBackendGlusterRefreshVol): Likewise. > * src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c > (virStorageBackendLogicalMakeVol): Likewise. > * src/storage/storage_backend_mpath.c > (virStorageBackendMpathNewVol): Likewise. > * src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c > (virStorageBackendSCSINewLun): Likewise. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > --- > src/storage/storage_backend.c | 74 > +++++++++++++---------------------- > src/storage/storage_backend.h | 7 +--- > src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c | 2 +- > src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 16 +++----- > src/storage/storage_backend_gluster.c | 4 +- > src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 2 +- > src/storage/storage_backend_mpath.c | 2 +- > src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) >
ACK. Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
