Brian - Had I read your code more closely, I would have seen this! I agree with you that handling this at the LWP layer makes more sense than handling it in Mechanize.
--- David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:07:43 -0400, "Brian Cassidy" wrote: > In my WWW::Mech sub-class, I'm not actually modifying > the response. > > WWW::Mech extracts the content out into its own > variable, thus I do the same > for the uncompressed content. If you happen to ask for > WWW::Mech's response > object ($a->response()) then you'll get the compressed > data and you'll have > to deal with that on your own. > > I'm not really sure how you'd have to handle it in LWP > at this point. I'd > prefer this be adapted in such a way that you wouldn't > have to mess with the > original response data.
