Pamela,
I think that this would introduce a constant source of tension and more
argument. And I hear we have enough of that :-)
I sympathize with Luis' unease in this case.
Thanks
Bruce
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:39 PM Pamela Chestek <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I was thinking that the public nature of the document would keep the
> recordkeeper honest. (Although I suppose that then spawns a second
> generation dispute about whether the document is accurate.) But the
> person with primary responsibility for its currency and completeness
> doesn't have to have final authority on its accuracy. That lesser burden
> could reside in a volunteer third party or board member.
>
> Mostly I was just trying to figure out how to avoid putting more work on
> volunteers.
>
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
