Hi Christine, Don't paint with too broad a brush. I understand your concern - open source is not a business plan! - but there are businesses and business plan that are fully aligned with the goals of the community.
Thanks, Van __________________________ Van Lindberg [email protected] m: 214.364.7985 On Wed, Jul 3, 2019, 5:43 PM Christine Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > On second thought, it's not the enterprise, or enterprise users, who > want restrictive licenses. It's vendors/developers seeking enterprise > customers who want to continue calling their software open source, but > be able to use non open source restrictions because their business plan > doesn't work. > > Christine Hall > Publisher & Editor > FOSS Force: Keeping tech free > http://fossforce.com > > On 7/3/19 5:05 PM, Bruce Perens via License-discuss wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:00 PM Christine Hall <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > as long as there are permissive licenses, the enterprise is quite > > happy with the way things are. > > > > > > Well, obviously, it's /restrictive /licenses they want from us now. And > > they can have them from Polyform and co., we don't and can't restrict > > anyone from using the license of their choice on their own work. Just > > please don't call them Open Source. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > License-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
