From: "Pat St. Jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > One more thing on that LGPL clause 3. I'm not even sure if it's legal. > I'll have to check the case law, but it's my understanding that only the > origional licensor can alter the conditions that the code is licensed > under. But that may depend on what state and federal district you're in. I don't think this is an issue. The copyright holder is putting out a license that explicitly includes the option for you to designate a GPL thread. You are only exercising an option you were given by that copyright holder, their license explicitly includes the GPL as a possibility. Thanks Bruce
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Paul Crowley
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Tim Pierce
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Nick Moffitt