From: John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't see how that can be made consistent with the GPL's claim that > "changing it [the GPL] is not allowed." Well, if reference to license text was considered derivation this would be a problem, but it isn't. Linus put a note before the copyrighted GPL text, he did not modify the GPL itself. Thanks Bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? Martin Konold
- Re: gpl backlash? John Cowan
- Re: gpl backlash? Kyle Rose
- Re: gpl backlash? John Cowan
- Re: gpl backlash? Seth David Schoen
- Re: gpl backlash? Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: gpl backlash? Seth David Schoen
- Re: gpl backlash? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? Seth David Schoen
- Re: gpl backlash? Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? Kyle Rose
- Re: gpl backlash? Martin Konold
- Re: gpl backlash? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gpl backlash? Martin Konold
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce