On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Kristofer Coward wrote: > True, but the only non-free software living at a low enough level to be > considered part of the OS (that I can think of) is qt (which a lot of open > source folk don't consider a threat to the movement). Okay, Qt licensing is still on-topic, so here goes: The current version of Qt is 100% Free Software and 100% Open Source. The previous versions of Qt (1.4x and prior) were not Free or Open (merely semi-free), and this may be what you meant. All software that is currently based on Qt 1.4x is being upgraded to work with Qt 2.0. It would make sense, at least until Qt 1.4x fades into history, that we refer to Qt by it's versions 1.4 or 2.0. -- Arandir... _______________________________ <http://www.meer.net/~arandir/>
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Tom Hull
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Rick Moen
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Alejandro Forero Cuervo
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Arandir
- Re: GNU License for Hardware mark
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Justin Wells
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Kristofer Coward
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Arandir
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Stephen Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Kristofer Coward
- Re: gEDA: Re: GNU License for Hardware Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins