On Tuesday 07 August 2001 06:27 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote: > Note that this rule doesn't hole for Java, Javascript, Flash, and other > forms of content that are transmitted to, and executed on, the client's > host. In this case, code is distributed to the user's system. I'd > argue GPL distribution obligations would triggered. I agree, and I hope I didn't imply that. If the Java, Flash, etc., content is under the GPL, then its transmittal over the web falls under the GPL. Whether or not they can be *runtime* linked to non-GPL applications is another topic. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Eric Jacobs
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' John Cowan
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' phil hunt
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Brian Behlendorf
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' SamBC
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' John Cowan
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Blake Cretney
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.