On Wednesday 08 August 2001 2:15 am, David Johnson wrote: > > My point is not whether a thing can be done, but whether it should > be done at all. I don't believe that Open Source licenses should > regulate in any way the actual execution of the software. Are you saying that the Open Source Definition should include a clause forbidding restrictions on the execution of the software? -- #===== Philip Hunt == [EMAIL PROTECTED] ======# Herbivore: effort-free public key email encryption. See: <http://www.vision25.demon.co.uk/oss/herbivore/intro.html> *** herbrip software now released ***
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Eric Jacobs
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' John Cowan
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' phil hunt
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Brian Behlendorf
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' SamBC
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' John Cowan
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Blake Cretney
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.