DeBug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I took a look at http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html > and read this: > > "If it's posted to Usenet it's in the public domain." > False. Nothing modern is in the public domain anymore unless the owner explicitly >puts > it in the public domain(*). Explicitly, as in you have a note from the author/owner > saying, "I grant this to the public domain." Those exact words or words very much >like them. > > Now i have a question - does it mean anonymous works cannot be put in > the public domain ?
I have another question: why is this being discussed on license-discuss? Can we take all the discussions about the nature of copyright and whether the GPL is appropriate to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or some other more appropriate mailing list? Ian -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
