Rod Dixon scripsit: > > You are both wrong. The designation of whether one license is incompatible > with the GPL says nothing about "violation." On FSF's website, they > designate some licenses as incompatible with the GPL. The question raised > was why the AFL is included in that list.
It is whether the of creating a work that is derivative from two other works, W licensed under license Alpha, and X licensed under the GPL, is lawful that determines whether or not Alpha is incompatible with the GPL. -- Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x) Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
