Lawrence E. Rosen writes: > OK, guys, play with me one more round. This time, let's do it in the > form of a law school exam question and let's get the lawyers and IANALs > on this list to chime in:
Nahhh. None of this is necessary. There's nothing in the AFL that says that you must use the same license on derivative works. Therefore, without reference to any other terms of the AFL, it is trivially compatible with the GPL insofar as derivative works get licensed under the GPL. Period. End of discussion. It's GPL-compatible. The only question is whether RMS will admit to making a mistake. -- -russ nelson angry-economist.russnelson.com | "What Problem Are You Trying Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | To Solve?" is a service mark 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of Crynwr Software. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3