On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Karl Fogel <kfo...@red-bean.com> wrote: > Luis Villa <l...@tieguy.org> writes: >>2) The archived OSI discussion about acceptance of the license, >>starting with the official license submission. For example, for MPL, >>this would be: >>http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2011-December/000005.html >> >>Before folks dive in, though: >> >>1) Does anyone object to this? >>2) Are there any additional pieces of information we could provide? > > Only that finding the archived OSI discussion may be non-trivial the > further back in time you go -- our archives moved to > projects.opensource.org only recently. I'm not sure how many different > homes they had before that, and I'm not sure which moves involved > copying over existing archives and which didn't. > > Cheery, eh? :-)
Yeah, I knew about that. I meant to say "archived discussion, if it can be found." :/ Luis _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
