By the way, a bunch of them are here:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Luis Villa <l...@tieguy.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Karl Fogel <kfo...@red-bean.com> wrote:
>> Luis Villa <l...@tieguy.org> writes:
>>>2) The archived OSI discussion about acceptance of the license,
>>>starting with the official license submission. For example, for MPL,
>>>this would be:
>>>http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2011-December/000005.html
>>>
>>>Before folks dive in, though:
>>>
>>>1) Does anyone object to this?
>>>2) Are there any additional pieces of information we could provide?
>>
>> Only that finding the archived OSI discussion may be non-trivial the
>> further back in time you go -- our archives moved to
>> projects.opensource.org only recently.  I'm not sure how many different
>> homes they had before that, and I'm not sure which moves involved
>> copying over existing archives and which didn't.
>>
>> Cheery, eh? :-)
>
> Yeah, I knew about that. I meant to say "archived discussion, if it
> can be found." :/
>
> Luis
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

Reply via email to