On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:09 PM, John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Luis Villa scripsit: > > > Slightly more broad than that: a list of licenses that we have rejected, > > including the rationales for rejection. Your list would presumably be a > > subset, as some licenses might have been submitted and rejected without a > > later, false claim to being open source. > > I think publishing such a list would be a supremely bad idea. Our > business is to approve licenses, not to disapprove them. Explaining why previous licenses have been rejected is, potentially, an important learning tool for our approval process - both for people who are considering drafting or submitting their licenses, and for us, so that we have a sense of our own history other than our collective heads. Luis
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
