On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:09:02 -0400 John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Luis Villa scripsit: > > > Slightly more broad than that: a list of licenses that we have > > rejected, including the rationales for rejection. Your list would > > presumably be a subset, as some licenses might have been submitted > > and rejected without a later, false claim to being open source. > > I think publishing such a list would be a supremely bad idea. Our > business is to approve licenses, not to disapprove them. But if a license *has* been rejected (in some official way -- does this actually apply to any submitted license, historically?) it is highly useful to understand why, really just as useful as understanding what's been approved (and why). - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss