I know they are open source because the authors have a website or github repo with the open source license. They just aren't including that license in the copy that they release through this company.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fleming <kevin+...@kpfleming.us> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Chris Ochs <ch...@ochsnet.com> wrote: > >> Some of these addons are themselves open source. The majority of the >> time the authors of these are not including the open source license. Which >> I think is legally ok, I'm guessing it actually just creates a dual >> license, but not an attorney so not sure on this. > > > > Snip: > Some of these addons are themselves open source. The majority of the time > the authors of these are not including the open source license. Which I > think is legally ok, I'm guessing it actually just creates a dual license, > but not an attorney so not sure on this. > > How do you know they are 'open source' if they don't include an open > source license? Are the completely original works, or do they contain works > from others that are distributed under open source licenses? > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
