Pamela Chestek scripsit: > I think this statement is a fallacy, but I'm happy to hear other > opinions. A license attaches to the intangible copyright, not to the > tangible copy of the work you received. So as long as I can show that > the same copyrighted work was available under a license, and that I am > in compliance with the license, then I am a licensed user no matter > where I got my copy of the work.
That can't be right. Consider a work available under GPL+proprietary terms, where you get to do non-GPL things if you have paid. Then it would not be enough to show that the work was available under a proprietary license to allow you to download it and do those things. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org How they ever reached any conclusion at all is starkly unknowable to the human mind. --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss