There likely will be some USG-only discussion beforehand, but since there are a lot of people to coordinate on this, the sooner I get started, the better.
Thanks, Cem Karan > -----Original Message----- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H. > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:00 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: > [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open > Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0 > > All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the > identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links > contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a > Web browser. > > > > > ---- > > Why not limit it to USG lawyers? That may be an easier sell for a first > meeting. Especially if you can convince someone at the OMB to host > the telcon because of the new policy and get the relevant DOJ lawyers to > dial in. > > > It is too much to expect clear guidance (this is the government after all) > but it would at least be useful if the lawyers that approved the > release of code.gov under CC0 could tell your lawyers why they thought it > was sufficient. Especially if these are the same set of lawyers > providing legal guidance to the White House OMB 20% OSS mandate. > > On 8/18/16, 4:36 PM, "License-discuss on behalf of Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY > RDECOM ARL (US)" <license-discuss- > boun...@opensource.org on behalf of cem.f.karan....@mail.mil> wrote: > > >Larry, I agree with you completely about the need for all attorneys > >talking to one another, while us engineers sit back and listen. I'm > >going to try to talk the various attorneys in the USG that I've > >contacted into being part of a telecon. If I'm able to do so, are > >there any attorneys on this list who would be interested in taking part > >in that discussion? If you are, please email me directly; put "ARL OSL > >telecon" as the subject line, and tell me what times are best for you > >relative to the Eastern Time Zone. > > > >PLEASE NOTE! That telecon MUST be for attorneys ONLY! I may be able > >to convince the ARL attorneys to talk to outside attorneys, but they > >will be VERY unhappy if anyone else is coming in on the line. There > >are good legal reasons for this; please don't try to sneak in. > > > >Thanks, > >Cem Karan > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > Caution-https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
