We moved away from SF due to poor reliability and their bug tracker was very unproductive, at the time.
Personnaly, I have no issues with svn, in fact I like it. I use git for most projects now and git-svn makes things even better. The main issue is how heavy trac is. It spends a lot of time in the DB. What I am willing to do is move it to my personal server and see how things go. If I cannot make it better, then we will have to see what options we have. At this point I am leaning towards launchpad because they seem to have a good tracker and collaboration system. I have to make the move by Dec 14th, so I will send out a notice when I can schedule some time to do the work. Most likely it will be dec 12 or 13. Jon -- Sent from my phone, please excuse brevity and typos On Dec 2, 2009 6:36 PM, "Arne Schmitz" <[email protected]> wrote: Am 30.11.2009 um 11:30 schrieb Erik Johansson: > We want something that can host code and has a bug tracker. The > alternatives I know of are: sou... We started out at sf.net and moved away. Don't know the reasons anymore, but there were some. :) > Google code looks ok and has a wiki. Launchpad does not have a wiki, > but web interface for doin... I have neither used Google Code nor Launchpad myself, so I cannot comment on their quality. > My suggestion: > Move bug tracker and code to launchpad. > Keep a wiki somewhere that licq.org ca... What's with the move away from subversion that you talked about in your email? I am still mainly using svn, but also trying out git. Launchpad seems to use Bazaar -- whatever that is! So what are the advantages of Launchpad? One thing I can see is the Ubuntu build service, which would of course be nice. Cheers, Arne -- Dipl.-Inform. Arne Schmitz Phone +49 (0)241 80-21817 Computer Graphics Group Mobile +49 (0)162 7278759 RWTH Aachen University Fax +49 (0)241 80-22899 Ahornstrasse 55, 52074 Aachen, Germany http://www.rwth-graphics.de
