So ... it seems to behave correctly. 'at' and 'with-param' are
mutually exclusive, and 'at' has a higher 'priority' which makes sense
to me.

All in all would be nice if Tyler can put this kind of stuff into the
documentation materials

Br's,
Marius

On Sep 18, 7:16 pm, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They seem to get inserted both within the content bind point.
>
> My default.html looks like:
>
> <div id="one">
>   <lift:bind name="other" />
> </div>
>
> <div id="two">
>   <lift:bind name="content" />
> </div>
>
> Using what you detailed below, neither get inserted if the "at"
> parameter doesnt match anything in the layout. Alterntivly, they both
> get inserted in the "at" element if it matches. The  <lift:with-param>
> stuff seems to be totally ignored.
>
> I've trawled the wiki but there appear to be no examples
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
> > I think it's:
>
> > <lift:surround with="default" at="content">
>
> >   <lift:with-param name="header">
> >     Header stuff
> >   </lift:with-param>
>
> >   <lift:with-param name="left-column">
> >     left column stuff
> >   </lift:with-param>
>
> >   main content stuff
>
> > </lift:surround>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to