Fair enough :) On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Scala's JSON parser sits on top of some of Scala's parsing problems > including recursive stuff that causes the parser to run out of stack when > there are too many of certain kinds of elements. > Even though you maintain Scala's JSON and can fix problems when they come > up, we also have to wait for the Scala release cycle. I'd rather keep the > JSON stuff in Lift, but you're encouraged to maintain it. > - Show quoted text - > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > <dchenbec...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> As long as we're talking about parsers for JSON, is there some problem or >> something missing from the Scala library's JSON parser that keeps us from >> using that in Lift? >> >> >> http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/files/api/scala/util/parsing/json/JSON$object.html >> >> I maintain that one, so if there's some issue that needs to be addressed >> I'd be happy to try and rectify it. I'm guessing that if Lift can't use it >> for some reason then it may be an issue for other people as well. >> >> Derek >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:47 AM, marius d. <marius.dan...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> Why not use Lift's parser one for the purpose of Record integration? >>> >>> However the way I see it converting from a Record to JSON the result >>> should be a JsObj structure so that it can be used in other JS >>> expressions. Also converting from a Record to JsObj is pretty straight >>> forward at this Record stage. >>> >>> Please don't get me wrong .. I really like what you did (as a generic >>> and isolated solution) but for Records stuff ... I don't see lots of >>> reasons to integrate it. >>> >>> Br's, >>> Marius >>> >>> On Mar 6, 10:11 pm, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.or...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > And I forgot the link: >>> > >>> > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/106757/ >>> > >>> > --j >>> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.or...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > Hey Folks, >>> > >>> > > I wrote a Json AST and parser/serializer for unrelated reasons >>> yesterday. >>> > > This could be the basis of a Record <--> Json tool. >>> > >>> > > --j >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:11 AM, David Pollak < >>> > > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> Hi, >>> > >>> > >>> I was thinking that it might be useful to be able to obtain a JSON >>> > >>> representation of a Record and also from a JSON construct to create >>> a >>> > >>> Record. >>> > >>> > >>> Record defines now: >>> > >>> > >>> def suplementalJs(ob: Box[KeyObfuscator]): List[(String, JsExp)] = >>> Nil >>> > >>> > >>> but that's not very intuitive ... not to mention not implemented >>> yet. >>> > >>> > >>> Thoughts ? >>> > >>> > >> I've been needing bi-directional JSON support to allow for the >>> creation of >>> > >> complex JSON data structures. >>> > >>> > >> So, my thought is I have a need, but not a solution. :-) >>> > >>> > >>> Br's, >>> > >>> Marius >>> > >>> > >> -- >>> > >> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >>> > >> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>> - Show quoted text - >>> > >> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >>> > >> Git some:http://github.com/dpp >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > - Show quoted text - > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
