Tobias,
There is no need to have a direct relation between snippets and model classes - why would you need to have a relationship? Snippets usually encompass a small element of functionality that might be related to one or more models - mapper or otherwise. Personally, I like that fact there is no coupling out of the box. Of course, you are free to name your snippets however you wish - if this involves some postfix, you can do that no problems at all. Cheers, Tim On 13/04/2009 11:04, "Tobias Daub" <hannes.flo...@gmx.li> wrote: > > Hi There, > > Is there any convention about how to name classes in the snippet package. > > In the ToDo example the snippet that corresponds to the ToDo Model was > named TD which is maybe not the best name. > > Would it be possible to prefix the class name with something, e.g. > ToDoFactory? Factory is probably not a really good name as well... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
