Okay... checked in a change that removes the <?...?> XML header as well
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:10 AM, fatu <fab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Yes it does indeed. Sorry, I was getting confused by the fact that >> Firefox still doesn't like the fragment but it happens both when using >> a view and when using a template + snippet. The DOCTYPE is indeed >> missing in both cases when "S.skipDocType" is on, I guess what's still >> causing trouble is the fact that the XML declaration is still there. >> >> I think I can remember seeing somewhere (group? blogs?) another flag >> that, when turned on, would skip the XML declaration but I can't find >> it right now. Is there really such a thing or did I only dream about >> it? > > > Lemme see what I can do. > > >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> On 3 Giu, 17:57, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:40 AM, fatu <fab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > ...Another question for now :-) >> > >> > > Does it work for views as well? >> > >> > It should. Views are treated just like static XHTML files... a source >> of >> > NodeSeq >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Many thanks. >> > >> > > Fabio >> > >> > > On 21 Mag, 15:38, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:27 AM, fatu <fab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > Right, didn't think about that alternative. >> > >> > > > > Thanks and best compliments to you and all the active Lift >> community >> > > > > for this superb Scala framework! I really think (and hope) it's >> going >> > > > > to have a big impact and a tremendous popularity rise in the next >> > > > > months, especially with more forthcoming books and articles >> spreading >> > > > > the word. >> > >> > > > We ask two things: build cool apps in Lift and be part of this >> community, >> > > > asking and answering questions. >> > >> > > > Thanks! >> > >> > > > > On 21 Mag, 06:42, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM, fatu <fab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > Hi David, >> > >> > > > > > > yes it will do, thank you so much for such a lightning-fast >> > > > > > > development in reply! >> > >> > > > > > > I'm only thinking about a case that is probably much more of >> an >> > > > > > > exception than a rule, i.e. when the snippet dynamically >> decides if >> > > it >> > > > > > > needs to generate a full page or a fragment (which is not a >> very >> > > good >> > > > > > > design anyway IMHO), for example based on some info passed. >> But >> > > even >> > > > > > > in that case the snippet will know that and will be able to >> set >> > > > > > > S.skipDocType = true accordingly, so it should be perfectly >> fine. >> > > Plus >> > > > > > > it won't be difficult at all to make the processing diverge in >> the >> > > 2 >> > > > > > > cases by using URL rewrites, redirecting it to a different >> template >> > > / >> > > > > > > snippet depending on parameters or URL structure, which is >> probably >> > > a >> > > > > > > better design too. >> > >> > > > > > You could also pass a header flag from your AJAX call. If the >> > > header's >> > > > > set, >> > > > > > you don't do the boilerplate surround that'll include all the >> <html>, >> > > > > <head> >> > > > > > and <body> tags. >> > >> > > > > > Anyway, enjoy and thanks for the use case. >> > >> > > > > > Party on. >> > >> > > > > > > Again many thanks everyone and David especially! >> > >> > > > > > > On May 20, 4:05 pm, David Pollak < >> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > I'm about to commit S.skipDocType = true | false. If you >> set it >> > > to >> > > > > true, >> > > > > > > > the <!DOCTYPE .../> will be omitted from the response page. >> This >> > > > > will >> > > > > > > allow >> > > > > > > > your AJAX fragements to pull parts of pages from the server. >> > > Note >> > > > > that >> > > > > > > > someplace in your snippets, you'll have to set S.skipDocType >> = >> > > true. >> > >> > > > > > > > Does this address your issue? >> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:13 AM, fatu <fab...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Marius, >> > >> > > > > > > > > as I understand them, Jx classes help in generating JS >> that can >> > > > > itself >> > > > > > > > > generate DOM at the client. Am I wrong? I'd really like >> to >> > > serve >> > > > > back >> > > > > > > > > an HTML fragment built by using the normal Lift template >> > > pipeline >> > > > > (so >> > > > > > > > > including surround & bind). Is that possible? >> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks >> > >> > > > > > > > > On 20 Mag, 13:16, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > As I understood you want to make an Ajax request and >> serve >> > > back a >> > > > > > > > > > Document Fragment. If so please also take a look at Jx >> stuff. >> > > We >> > > > > > > > > > discuss Jx classes in a fairly amount of details in the >> lift >> > > > > book. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Br's, >> > > > > > > > > > Marius >> > >> > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 9:32 am, fatu <fab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Timothy, >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > thanks for the links, I found them useful and I find >> your >> > > blog >> > > > > in >> > > > > > > > > > > general very interesting. Came across scala-blogs.organd >> > > it >> > > > > looks >> > > > > > > > > > > quite promising as well. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I knew "bind" already from the "Exploring Lift" book >> which >> > > I >> > > > > pull >> > > > > > > from >> > > > > > > > > > > git, build with Lyx and keep at hand regularly. In the >> > > doctype >> > > > > > > post, >> > > > > > > > > > > though, I couldn't find a way to specify "no doctype" >> > > which I >> > > > > > > think >> > > > > > > > > > > is necessary to serve a fragment; plus I couldn't find >> any >> > > > > other >> > > > > > > easy >> > > > > > > > > > > "out-of-the-box" way to do it. Shouldn't this use case >> > > (serving >> > > > > > > > > > > fragments), which I think is quite common, be better / >> more >> > > > > easily >> > > > > > > > > > > supported by the framework? Can someone post an >> example of >> > > how >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > do >> > > > > > > > > > > it with raw response handling in the meanwhile? >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks anybody. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Fabio >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On 26 Apr, 21:49, Timothy Perrett >> <timo...@getintheloop.eu >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > George, >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > To tell lift what doctype you want to use see my >> blog >> > > post >> > > > > here: >> > > > > > > > >http://is.gd/uJ4L >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Also, you'll want to read another one of my posts in >> > > which I >> > > > > > > discuss >> > > > > > > > > > > > the bind(...) method and how you can stop putting >> markup >> > > into >> > > > > > > your >> > > > > > > > > > > > snippets:http://is.gd/sfyT >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Tim >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 1:02 pm, george < >> geo...@mattandgeorge.com> >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > hello all, >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > hopefully someone can help me out here. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > i am trying to port some simple ajax stuff over to >> lift >> > > > > from a >> > > > > > > > > rails >> > > > > > > > > > > > > app. basically it just loads anhtmlfragmentand >> puts it >> > > into >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > dom >> > > > > > > > > > > > > using prototype. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > i have set up a template which contains >> thefragmentat >> > > > > src/main/ >> > > > > > > > > > > > > webapp/fragment.html >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > <ul><li>item</li></ul> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > then i made the page available using the SiteMap >> and >> > > all >> > > > > seems >> > > > > > > > > good, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > but here comes the problem >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > the lift response adds the xml declaration and >> doctype, >> > > one >> > > > > of >> > > > > > > > > which >> > > > > > > > > > > > > seems to cause prototype some problems >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > <!DOCTYPEhtmlPUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 >> > > > > Transitional//EN" " >> > > > > > > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > <ul><li>item</li></ul> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > so the question is, how can i make lift send back >> the >> > > > > > > > > rawhtmlwithout >> > > > > > > > > > > > > meddling with it? >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > i have tried out using ResourceServer to serve it >> > > > > statically >> > > > > > > which >> > > > > > > > > > > > > works, but this wouldn't allow me to generate >> > > thefragment >> > > > > > > > > > > > > dynamically. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also prefer to have a separatehtmltemplate >> file >> > > > > rather >> > > > > > > than >> > > > > > > > > > > > > embedding the markup code in a snippet. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > any thoughts gratefully received.. >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > george >> > >> > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >> > > > > > > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> > > > > > > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >> > > > > > > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >> > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >> > > > > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> > > > > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >> > > > > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >> > >> > > > -- >> > > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >> > > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> > > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >> > > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >> > >> > -- >> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
