I was aware of master.pdf before I ordered the book. Somehow I had expected that the publisher would do some value-adding for the print version, like formatting and indexing. When I tried to follow a "See appendix..." hint in the book for the first time I thought amazon had sent me a misprint version... Another thing that I really miss is a page header telling the current chapter. Just in case you publish a second edition ;-)
Nonetheless thanks for writing the book! Steffen. > We're also disappointed that the book had neither an index or the > appendices. Their omission was due to some issues with the way that APress > handles FirstPress books. The index was definitely not possible for them, > and the removal of the appendices was done so that the book would be printed > in time (their printing workflow supposedly didn't allow for > X chapters > and would have had to been rewritten). The appendices are available in PDF > here: > > http://www.apress.com/book/downloadfile/4390 > > If you want a full PDF with index and appendices, you can check out the > open-source version of the book here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/the-lift-book > > The master.pdf under "Files" is the most up-to-date version, and as I have > time I update it with feedback. The two versions aren't 100% identical but > they are very similar. > > Derek > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Steffen Weißmann > <steffen.weissm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Sorry, it was a "beginning scala" problem: Instead of >> >> val prod = Product.create.... i had >> def prod = Product.create... >> >> then prod.save returned true and prod.id=-1... >> >> Also sorry for posting this twice, but for some reason it took several >> hours until the mails showed up on the list, I didn't expect that... >> >> BTW: I have bought your Lift book (the paper version...), and I am a >> little disappointed that it has neither an appendix nor an index. What >> was the reason for that? >> >> >> Cheers, Steffen. >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Derek Chen-Becker<dchenbec...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Is it always the same one that gets a correct ID, and if you comment out >> > that save does the other one get a correct ID? I'm just wondering if >> > there's >> > something sequential related to retrieving the generated IDs. >> > >> > Derek >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Steffen Weißmann >> > <steffen.weissm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i am using two Mapper classes, both extend LongKeyedMapper[..] with >> >> IdPK. After saving (returns true for both) one class always has id=-1, >> >> the id of the other class counts up as expected. The id is however >> >> correct when i list the table from another snippet. Any hints? >> >> >> >> Thanks, Steffen. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Steffen Weissmann >> >> Technische Universitaet Berlin - Math. Department - MA 3-2 >> >> Str. des 17. Juni 136 >> 10623 Berlin - Germany >> >> Phone: +49 30 314-29278 >> Mail: weissm...@math.tu-berlin.de >> Web: www.math.tu-berlin.de/~weissman >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
