On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Derek Chen-Becker <[email protected]>wrote:
> I think that that's a general issue with SOAP, not particular to Lift ;) > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Timothy Perrett > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Id be interested to hear those stories... all the ones i've heard so >> far that involve anything to do with SOAP have usually been tales of >> woe ;-) >> > With Goat Rodeo, you can define message flow with an abstract source (input) and sink (output) in the form: Foo %> Bar %> (Baz * Distribution) You can define fork/join constructs, tee constructs, etc. in the high level flow description. The flow description defines the type-safe progression from each logic unit. The location of each logic unit and the threading/transport model is decided at runtime. This means that you can define logic models and plug in an "Akka distribution and threading" strategy for production or a "single threaded" strategy for your local test harness. You'll also be able to register the composed modules that can be composed into larger flows. So, how does this work with SOAP? Well.. the SOAP piece is just a source and sink for the logic flow. > >> Cheers, Tim >> >> On Aug 15, 6:47 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I think there will be an important Goat Rodeo/Lift/SOAP story that I'll >> be >> > able to tell in a week or so... integrating WS into Lift (rather than >> > running on the side) will, I think, have benefits. >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Timothy Perrett >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > Sounds like a classic situation.... what is technically possible is >> > > one thing but what you should do to preserve your sanity is most >> > > probably another ;-) >> > >> > > Good luck! >> > >> > > Cheers, Tim >> > >> > > On Aug 15, 4:29 am, Meredith Gregory <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > Tim, Viktor, >> > >> > > > Thanks for the insights and sharing of experience. i'm in a >> situation >> > > where >> > > > i'm working with legacy stuff. i was just wondering how deeply into >> lift >> > > i >> > > > could push the WSDL-based Java handlers. >> > >> > > > Best wishes, >> > >> > > > --greg >> > >> > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Timothy Perrett >> <[email protected] >> > > >wrote: >> > >> > > > > I agree with Viktor - in a similar vein, this is exactly what I >> > > > > implemented with Akka; the servlet runs in conjunction with lifts >> > > > > filter and lift just hands off stuff it doesnt know what to do >> with. >> > > > > So if you want to use AxisServlet or whatever its real easy. >> > >> > > > > From my point of view, you'd need a good reason to bring the SOAP >> > > > > stuff into lift; right now i havent found one... I write a lot of >> lift >> > > > > apps that consume SOAP services, but as yet have no good reason to >> > > > > write a SOAP serving app with lift - If i were to do one, id do >> > > > > exactly as with the JAX-RS stuff in Akka and passNotFoundToChain. >> > >> > > > > Cheers, Tim >> > >> > > > > On Aug 14, 10:24 pm, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > Gregory, >> > >> > > > > > Depending on what WS-* stuff you're using, you _should_ be able >> to >> > > wire >> > > > > the >> > > > > > AxisServlet in web.xml under /ws/* or something like that, and >> then >> > > have >> > > > > > lift passNotFoundToChain=true >> > >> > > > > > But I guess it boils down to what liftiness you're planning to >> do. >> > > Can >> > > > > you >> > > > > > elaborate a bit on what you're aiming for? >> > >> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Meredith Gregory >> > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > Tim, Viktor, >> > >> > > > > > > Do you wire your SOAP services into lift or do you keep that >> > > > > independent? i >> > > > > > > was just talking to DPP and according to him it appears you >> can >> > > > > successfully >> > > > > > > wire WS-generated code anywhere along in the http-request >> > > processing >> > > > > > > pipeline. He pointed out a gotcha that i think can be >> circumvented >> > > with >> > > > > > > HttpServletResponse trampoline. Both lift and the WS-generated >> code >> > > are >> > > > > > > likely to want to be in the driver's seat regarding who's >> returning >> > > the >> > > > > > > bytes. But, i think you can just fool the WS-generated code >> into >> > > > > thinking >> > > > > > > it's got an HttpServletResponse that is really a widget that >> will >> > > just >> > > > > write >> > > > > > > into the one lift returns. In this way you can write a >> > > 1-size-fits-all >> > > > > > > return adapter. Is this what you guys are doing, or am i >> making >> > > this >> > > > > too >> > > > > > > complicated? >> > >> > > > > > > Best wishes, >> > >> > > > > > > --greg >> > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > L.G. Meredith >> > > > > > > Managing Partner >> > > > > > > Biosimilarity LLC >> > > > > > > 1219 NW 83rd St >> > > > > > > Seattle, WA 98117 >> > >> > > > > > > +1 206.650.3740 >> > >> > > > > > >http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com >> > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Viktor Klang >> > >> > > > > > Rogue Scala-head >> > >> > > > > > Blog: klangism.blogspot.com >> > > > > > Twttr: viktorklang >> > >> > > > -- >> > > > L.G. Meredith >> > > > Managing Partner >> > > > Biosimilarity LLC >> > > > 1219 NW 83rd St >> > > > Seattle, WA 98117 >> > >> > > > +1 206.650.3740 >> > >> > > >http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com >> > >> > -- >> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >> >> > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
