Two points. 1. Could you explain in more detail the advantage of a friendly URL? 2. Keep in mind that it's "safer" for MVC frameworks to implement such a scheme, because you only use pagination on a page which is designed with pagination in mind. In Lift, with View First, pagination could coexist alongside another snippet that uses the 'page' query parameter. Technically you could have to PaginatedSnippets side by side on the same page. So how would you solve the problem of them keeping their information to themselves?
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are very few things truly stateless in lift such as > LiftRules.statelessDispatchTable. Once you bind functions Lift creates > a name for these functions. These names are quite opaque (I think Dave > wanted to add a mechanism to allow users to specify their own > naming ...). For each page rendering these names are generated so if > you just refresh a page this names will change. This is important for > security reasons. > > If you don't like this mechanism you could easily write your own > pagination using your own URL's and query string params. > > Br's, > Marius > > On Oct 18, 3:54 pm, night_stalker <usur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you for your explanation. > > > > The reason is users don't get the same page with the same url, > > and, they can't read the url. > > Just wondering if I can use existing classes or should write my own. > > It seems I shouldn't use stateful snippet for this, "stateless" > > requirement. > > > > Best regards. > > > > On Oct 18, 6:35 pm, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > F1054255562605UD5 means that a function on server side will be invoked > > > when this is sent. I believe these is a function that the Paginator is > > > binding automatically. Is there a more specific reason why you want > > > this ? > > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > > On Oct 18, 11:12 am, night_stalker <usur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, I've just tried the PaginatedSnippet and is willing to make > > > > some query pages with it, but the url parameter looks not very good > (I > > > > got a "/post?F1054255562605UD5=_ "). > > > > > > So —— how to make paginated page's url more friendly? I'd prefer > > > > something like "/posts?page=2". > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
