Right, no one likes mutable anything :-) I kinda wondered why you haven't pushed forward any more with the current record implementation... can one assume that is why - because it didn't feel right?
Some of this stuff is going to be fundamental to how we move forward - id love to perhaps discuss something that would be better than what we have already. Even if its just pie in the sky talk... Cheers, Tim On 22 Oct 2009, at 17:22, David Pollak wrote: > I don't like mutable fields. I don't like manual saving. Dunno... > it's hard to articulate... it just feels wrong in my tummy. Also, I > want to be clear that I think Marius did a great job of cleaning up > some of the problems with Mapper when he did Record... my comments > are not a negative to him... there's just something unsatisfying > about the whole approach. > > Bet that was less than helpful. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
